Income tax employees federation, Mumbai circle
S U M M A R Y :
Chronology of developments with
reference to own-merit & other issues in a nutshell based on our
understanding of the issues and judgments over a period of time:
1995
|
Own Merit came
into operation through 77th amendment of the constitution. Object of
reservation is to provide adequate representation to the SC/ST candidate
|
2002
|
Through this OM DOPT clarified the Own merit concept and
stated that post will be adjusted against general quota, this is after the 85th
amendment of the Constitution.
|
2005
|
Through this OM DOPT issued fresh clarification and stated
that OM of 2002 is effective from the date of issue, and that concept of own
merit did not apply to the promotions made by non – selection method.
|
2006
|
Madras CAT in the case of Kalugasalamoorthy vs Union of India has set aside the
|
2007
|
Madras High Court
has upheld the decision of the CAT
in the above case
|
August, 2010
|
DOPT withdrawn the
|
27th Sept. 2010
|
Manulal Bhaita
& others filed OA in Mumbai CAT
for implementing the
|
8th Dec. 2010
|
The above persons filed fresh Misc. Application in the CAT
for interim relief restraining
from conducting any DPC
|
9th December
2010
|
The Hon’ble CAT
allowed the MA and stayed the DPC up to 5.01.2011
|
12th January 2011
|
Mumbai CAT passed order
and directed to implement the
|
January 2011
|
Some General Candidate also approached the Mumbai CAT for
extended Zone of consideration and brought stay on 29 vacancies
|
24th January 2011
|
Board issued a circular and clarified that
|
March 2011
|
ITSEWA filed fresh OA in Mumbai CAT challenging the direction of
Board.
|
April 2011
|
Since we moved to new recruitment year new eligibility list published after exam result
|
May 2011
|
Mumbai CCIT filed MA for
vacation of stay
|
July 2011
|
Mumbai CAT reserved the order on OA and stay continued
|
15th July 2011
|
High Court of
Punjab & Haryana which was dealing
a case filed by General candidate(Inspector) against 2007 Punjab CAT
decision allowing own merit from 1995,
and after considering the DOPT OM of August 2010, ruled that no reservation in promotion could be made
in pursuance to OM dated 2.07.1997. Judgment of Punjab CAT set aside Instruction dated 31.01.2005 stands
withdrawn on 10.08.2010. Further
Instructions dated 10.08.2010 are quashed because they are in direct conflict
with the view taken by the Constitution Bench in M. Nagaraj”s case and Suraj
Bhan Meens’s case. Further directed
that seniority and promotion of the Income Tax Inspector shall be made
without any element of reservation in Promotion.
|
3rd August 2011
|
Mumbai CAT delivered the judgment and imposed penalty of
Rs. 25000/- on Respondent and directed to implement the
|
24th August 2011
|
CBDT issued instruction to all the CCIT (CCA)_to implement
the Mumbai CAT order before 15th
October, 2011
|
Sept.2011
|
|
October 2011
|
Jaipur CAT quashed the direction of board
directing to implement the
|
14th October 2011
|
Mumbai CCIT challenged the order
of Mumbai CAT in Bombay High Court.
Some general candidate also challenged the Mumbai CAT order in High Court. The matter is likely to come up on 8th
November, 2011
|
21stOctober 2011
|
ITSEWA once again brought stay
on regular promotion for a period of two weeks and CAT again
directed the dept.to implement
the OM and to maintain status
quo
|
21stOctober 2011
|
Mumbai CCIT filed MA before the CAT for vacating the
stay on promotion
|
22-10-2011
|
CAT posted the matter for
hearing on 31.10.2011
|
31.10.2011
|
CAT again adjourned the
matter to 14.11.2011 for filing the
rejoinder and posted the matter to 14.11.2011
|
4th November 2011
|
In the matter of Zone of consideration the case once again adjourned and posted to
29th Nov. 2011 for filing rejoinder
|
we got stay on not implementation of DOP&T O.M Dt 10.08.2012 by AIOBC DEFENCE
ReplyDelete